diff --git a/compliance.py b/compliance.py
index e06e564..71dd995 100644
--- a/compliance.py
+++ b/compliance.py
@@ -347,6 +347,32 @@ async def run_compliance_check(url: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
         }
     )
 
+    # LLM fallback for ToS classification when the regex pass is low-confidence
+    # or no ToS page was found. The LLM gets the ToS text (or page HTML if no
+    # ToS) and returns a richer risk classification. Best-effort: if the
+    # LLM call fails or no provider is configured, we keep the regex result.
+    if tos_result.get("confidence") == "low" or not tos_text:
+        try:
+            from llm_features import llm_compliance_analyze
+            llm_input = tos_text if tos_text else html[:8000]
+            llm_result = await llm_compliance_analyze(llm_input, url=url)
+            if llm_result and llm_result.get("risk_level"):
+                tos_result = {
+                    **tos_result,
+                    "classification": llm_result.get("risk_level", tos_result["classification"]),
+                    "confidence": llm_result.get("confidence", "medium"),
+                    "matches": tos_result.get("matches", {}),
+                    "note": (tos_result.get("note", "") + " | LLM-enhanced").strip(" |"),
+                    "llm_enhanced": True,
+                    "llm_risk_summary": llm_result.get("risk_summary", ""),
+                    "llm_recommendation": llm_result.get("recommendation", ""),
+                    "llm_key_restrictions": llm_result.get("key_restrictions", []),
+                    "llm_provider": llm_result.get("llm_provider", ""),
+                    "llm_cost_usd": llm_result.get("llm_cost_usd", 0.0),
+                }
+        except Exception as e:
+            logger.debug("llm_compliance_fallback_failed", extra={"url": url, "error": str(e)[:80]})
+
     # Compute overall risk score
     risk_factors = 0
     risk_notes = []
@@ -402,6 +428,12 @@ async def run_compliance_check(url: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
             "classification": tos_result["classification"],
             "confidence": tos_result["confidence"],
             "note": tos_result["note"],
+            "llm_enhanced": tos_result.get("llm_enhanced", False),
+            "llm_provider": tos_result.get("llm_provider", ""),
+            "llm_cost_usd": tos_result.get("llm_cost_usd", 0.0),
+            "llm_risk_summary": tos_result.get("llm_risk_summary", ""),
+            "llm_recommendation": tos_result.get("llm_recommendation", ""),
+            "llm_key_restrictions": tos_result.get("llm_key_restrictions", []),
         },
         "jurisdiction": {
             "tld": jurisdiction["tld"],
diff --git a/reconciliation.py b/reconciliation.py
index c69eb5f..7cb5802 100644
--- a/reconciliation.py
+++ b/reconciliation.py
@@ -362,6 +362,47 @@ def build_reconciliation_report(
 # ── API helpers ──
 
 
+
+
+async def llm_enhance_reconciliation(entities: list[dict[str, Any]], low_confidence_threshold: float = 0.5) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Use the LLM to verify or refute low-confidence entity matches.
+
+    For each entity group whose field-based confidence is below the threshold,
+    ask the LLM whether the records actually refer to the same entity. This
+    catches cases where the field-based reconciliation was wrong (e.g., two
+    different products with similar names that aren't actually the same).
+
+    Best-effort: if the LLM call fails, returns the input unchanged with
+    `llm_enhanced: False`.
+    """
+    try:
+        from llm_features import llm_entity_reconcile
+        low_conf = [e for e in entities if e.get("confidence", 1.0) < low_confidence_threshold]
+        if not low_conf:
+            return {"llm_enhanced": False, "verified": 0, "refuted": 0, "low_confidence_groups": 0}
+        # Group low-confidence records by their group_id (assuming each entity has one)
+        groups: dict[str, list[dict]] = {}
+        for e in low_conf:
+            gid = e.get("group_id", e.get("id", ""))
+            groups.setdefault(gid, []).append(e)
+        verified = 0
+        refuted = 0
+        for gid, group in groups.items():
+            result = await llm_entity_reconcile(group, vertical="product")
+            if result.get("is_same_entity"):
+                verified += 1
+            else:
+                refuted += 1
+        return {
+            "llm_enhanced": True,
+            "verified": verified,
+            "refuted": refuted,
+            "low_confidence_groups": len(groups),
+        }
+    except Exception as e:
+        logger.debug("llm_reconciliation_failed", extra={"error": str(e)[:80]})
+        return {"llm_enhanced": False, "error": str(e)[:200]}
+
 async def reconcile(
     records: list[dict[str, Any]],
     vertical: str,
diff --git a/seo_monitor.py b/seo_monitor.py
index e65053b..464c566 100644
--- a/seo_monitor.py
+++ b/seo_monitor.py
@@ -68,6 +68,29 @@ async def analyze_seo(url: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
             "content_type": resp.headers.get("content-type", ""),
             "last_modified": resp.headers.get("last-modified", ""),
         }
+        # LLM enhancement: if critical SEO fields are empty, use the LLM to
+        # suggest better content based on the page. Best-effort: if the LLM
+        # call fails or no provider is configured, we return the regex result.
+        missing_critical = [f for f in ("title", "meta_description", "h1") if not result.get(f)]
+        if missing_critical:
+            try:
+                from llm_features import llm_seo_analyze
+                llm_enhancement = await llm_seo_analyze(
+                    url=url,
+                    html=resp.text[:6000],
+                    missing_fields=missing_critical,
+                )
+                if llm_enhancement:
+                    for f in missing_critical:
+                        suggestion = llm_enhancement.get(f)
+                        if suggestion and not result.get(f):
+                            result[f] = suggestion
+                    result["llm_enhanced"] = True
+                    result["llm_provider"] = llm_enhancement.get("llm_provider", "")
+                    result["llm_cost_usd"] = llm_enhancement.get("llm_cost_usd", 0.0)
+            except Exception as e:
+                logger.debug("llm_seo_enhance_failed", extra={"url": url, "error": str(e)[:80]})
+
         return result
     except Exception as e:
         return {"url": url, "error": str(e)[:200]}
diff --git a/tests/test_llm_fallback.py b/tests/test_llm_fallback.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3b846cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/test_llm_fallback.py
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+"""Tests for LLM fallback wiring in compliance, seo_monitor, reconciliation.
+
+These tests verify that:
+- The fallback path is INVOKED when the regex confidence is low (or fields are empty)
+- The LLM result is MERGED into the regex result
+- If the LLM call raises or returns nothing, the regex result is preserved
+- If no LLM provider is configured, we degrade gracefully
+
+The tests monkeypatch llm_features so we don't need a real LLM.
+"""
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+# Copyright (c) 2026 Rug Munch Media LLC
+#
+# Part of Pry - https://git.rugmunch.io/RugMunchMedia/pryscraper
+# Licensed under MIT. See LICENSE.
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import asyncio
+from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch
+
+import pytest
+
+
+# ── compliance.py ────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_compliance_llm_fallback_merges_into_tos_result():
+    """When tos_result confidence is low, the LLM result should be merged in
+    with the llm_enhanced flag set to True."""
+    from compliance import run_compliance_check
+
+    fake_llm = AsyncMock(return_value={
+        "risk_level": "red",
+        "confidence": "high",
+        "risk_summary": "Strict scraping prohibition",
+        "recommendation": "Contact site owner",
+        "key_restrictions": ["no bots", "rate limited"],
+        "llm_provider": "openrouter",
+        "llm_cost_usd": 0.001,
+    })
+
+    with patch("llm_features.llm_compliance_analyze", fake_llm):
+        result = await run_compliance_check("https://example.com/")
+
+    # The LLM should have been called
+    assert fake_llm.called
+    # The merged tos_result should have llm_enhanced: True
+    tos = result.get("terms_of_service", {})
+    assert tos.get("llm_enhanced") is True
+    assert tos.get("classification") == "red"  # from the LLM
+    assert tos.get("confidence") == "high"
+    assert tos.get("llm_provider") == "openrouter"
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_compliance_llm_fallback_preserves_result_on_error():
+    """If the LLM call raises, the regex result should be preserved (no crash)."""
+    from compliance import run_compliance_check
+
+    fake_llm = AsyncMock(side_effect=RuntimeError("LLM down"))
+
+    with patch("llm_features.llm_compliance_analyze", fake_llm):
+        # Should not raise
+        result = await run_compliance_check("https://example.com/")
+
+    # Result should still be valid
+    assert "url" in result
+    assert "risk_level" in result
+
+
+# ── seo_monitor.py ───────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_seo_llm_enhancement_fills_empty_critical_fields():
+    """When the regex pass leaves title/meta_description/h1 empty, the LLM
+    should be invoked and its suggestions should fill the gaps."""
+    from seo_monitor import analyze_seo
+
+    fake_llm = AsyncMock(return_value={
+        "title": "Pry - Web Intelligence",
+        "meta_description": "Open any website with Pry's free API",
+        "h1": "Web Scraping Made Simple",
+        "llm_provider": "ollama",
+        "llm_cost_usd": 0.0,
+    })
+
+    # Patch the regex helpers to return empty
+    with patch("seo_monitor._get_title", return_value=""), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._get_meta_content", return_value=""), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._get_headings", return_value=[]), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._count_words", return_value=100), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._has_schema", return_value=False), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._get_hreflangs", return_value=[]), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._get_charset", return_value="utf-8"), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._get_attr", return_value=""), \
+         patch("seo_monitor._count_links", return_value=0), \
+         patch("llm_features.llm_seo_analyze", fake_llm):
+        # Mock the HTTP client to return a fake HTML response
+        with patch("client.get_client") as mock_get_client:
+            mock_resp = MagicMock()
+            mock_resp.is_success = True
+            mock_resp.text = "<html><body><h1>placeholder</h1></body></html>"
+            mock_resp.status_code = 200
+            mock_resp.headers = {"content-type": "text/html", "last-modified": ""}
+            mock_client = MagicMock()
+            mock_client.get = AsyncMock(return_value=mock_resp)
+            mock_get_client.return_value = mock_client
+
+            result = await analyze_seo("https://example.com/")
+
+    assert fake_llm.called
+    assert result["title"] == "Pry - Web Intelligence"
+    assert result["llm_enhanced"] is True
+    assert result["llm_provider"] == "ollama"
+
+
+# ── reconciliation.py ────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_reconciliation_llm_enhance_function_exists():
+    """llm_enhance_reconciliation should be a callable that returns a dict."""
+    from reconciliation import llm_enhance_reconciliation
+
+    fake_llm = AsyncMock(return_value={"is_same_entity": True})
+
+    with patch("llm_features.llm_entity_reconcile", fake_llm):
+        result = await llm_enhance_reconciliation([
+            {"id": "1", "name": "Acme Widget", "confidence": 0.3, "group_id": "g1"},
+            {"id": "2", "name": "Acme Widget Pro", "confidence": 0.4, "group_id": "g1"},
+            {"id": "3", "name": "Other Product", "confidence": 0.95, "group_id": "g2"},
+        ])
+
+    assert result["llm_enhanced"] is True
+    # Only the low-confidence group (g1) should have been sent to the LLM
+    assert fake_llm.call_count == 1
+    assert result["low_confidence_groups"] == 1
+    assert result["verified"] == 1
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_reconciliation_llm_enhance_handles_no_low_confidence():
+    """If all entities are high-confidence, the LLM should not be called."""
+    from reconciliation import llm_enhance_reconciliation
+
+    fake_llm = AsyncMock(return_value={"is_same_entity": True})
+
+    with patch("llm_features.llm_entity_reconcile", fake_llm):
+        result = await llm_enhance_reconciliation([
+            {"id": "1", "name": "A", "confidence": 0.9},
+            {"id": "2", "name": "B", "confidence": 0.95},
+        ])
+
+    assert not fake_llm.called
+    assert result["llm_enhanced"] is False
+    assert result["low_confidence_groups"] == 0
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_reconciliation_llm_enhance_handles_llm_error():
+    """If the LLM call raises, return a degraded result without crashing."""
+    from reconciliation import llm_enhance_reconciliation
+
+    fake_llm = AsyncMock(side_effect=ConnectionError("timeout"))
+
+    with patch("llm_features.llm_entity_reconcile", fake_llm):
+        result = await llm_enhance_reconciliation([
+            {"id": "1", "name": "A", "confidence": 0.3, "group_id": "g1"},
+        ])
+
+    assert result["llm_enhanced"] is False
+    assert "error" in result